Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision under s.263, holding the assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue for permitting a one-time deduction of accumulated foreign exchange loss on ECB repayment. Applying AS-11/ICDS-VI principles, the Tribunal confirmed that exchange differences must be recognized at each balance-sheet date and only the current-year fluctuation (Rs. 2,34,703.29 as found by PCIT) is allowable; the assessee's claimed deduction of Rs. 28,72,92,351/- was disallowed. The matter was set aside to the AO for fresh determination in accordance with PCIT's directions, affording the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision under s.263, holding the assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue for permitting a one-time deduction of accumulated foreign exchange loss on ECB repayment. Applying AS-11/ICDS-VI principles, the Tribunal confirmed that exchange differences must be recognized at each balance-sheet date and only the current-year fluctuation (Rs. 2,34,703.29 as found by PCIT) is allowable; the assessee's claimed deduction of Rs. 28,72,92,351/- was disallowed. The matter was set aside to the AO for fresh determination in accordance with PCIT's directions, affording the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
