Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision under s.263, holding the assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue for permitting a one-time deduction of accumulated foreign exchange loss on ECB repayment. Applying AS-11/ICDS-VI principles, the Tribunal confirmed that exchange differences must be recognized at each balance-sheet date and only the current-year fluctuation (Rs. 2,34,703.29 as found by PCIT) is allowable; the assessee's claimed deduction of Rs. 28,72,92,351/- was disallowed. The matter was set aside to the AO for fresh determination in accordance with PCIT's directions, affording the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision under s.263, holding the assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue for permitting a one-time deduction of accumulated foreign exchange loss on ECB repayment. Applying AS-11/ICDS-VI principles, the Tribunal confirmed that exchange differences must be recognized at each balance-sheet date and only the current-year fluctuation (Rs. 2,34,703.29 as found by PCIT) is allowable; the assessee's claimed deduction of Rs. 28,72,92,351/- was disallowed. The matter was set aside to the AO for fresh determination in accordance with PCIT's directions, affording the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.