Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellant's classification of imported multimedia speakers under CTH 8518 was affirmed and the impugned reclassification to CTH 85279100 set aside; the CESTAT held that multimedia speakers with ancillary USB/SD/MMC playback and/or FM radio features fall within Chapter Heading 8518, consistent with prior tribunal and high court authorities, and that MRP-based valuation is inapplicable to such classification. Consequently, the assessment order ordering reclassification was held unsustainable, the assessment set aside, and the appeal allowed, resulting in confirmation of the Appellant's original tariff treatment and corresponding relief from the contested levy.
The Appellant's classification of imported multimedia speakers under CTH 8518 was affirmed and the impugned reclassification to CTH 85279100 set aside; the CESTAT held that multimedia speakers with ancillary USB/SD/MMC playback and/or FM radio features fall within Chapter Heading 8518, consistent with prior tribunal and high court authorities, and that MRP-based valuation is inapplicable to such classification. Consequently, the assessment order ordering reclassification was held unsustainable, the assessment set aside, and the appeal allowed, resulting in confirmation of the Appellant's original tariff treatment and corresponding relief from the contested levy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
