Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 22-01-2025 concerning allegations of facilitating evasion of GST by partner hotels, concluding that the matter requires further adjudication after affording procedural fairness. The court found that Respondent No.1 must grant the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing based on all supplementary documents the Petitioner furnished, and remitted the matter for reconsideration consistent with principles of natural justice and statutory scheme under GST law. In consequence, the writ petition is disposed of without adjudication on merits, leaving open Respondent No.1's regulatory and adjudicatory pathway to determine contravention of GST provisions after hearing the Petitioner.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 22-01-2025 concerning allegations of facilitating evasion of GST by partner hotels, concluding that the matter requires further adjudication after affording procedural fairness. The court found that Respondent No.1 must grant the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing based on all supplementary documents the Petitioner furnished, and remitted the matter for reconsideration consistent with principles of natural justice and statutory scheme under GST law. In consequence, the writ petition is disposed of without adjudication on merits, leaving open Respondent No.1's regulatory and adjudicatory pathway to determine contravention of GST provisions after hearing the Petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
