Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 22-01-2025 concerning allegations of facilitating evasion of GST by partner hotels, concluding that the matter requires further adjudication after affording procedural fairness. The court found that Respondent No.1 must grant the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing based on all supplementary documents the Petitioner furnished, and remitted the matter for reconsideration consistent with principles of natural justice and statutory scheme under GST law. In consequence, the writ petition is disposed of without adjudication on merits, leaving open Respondent No.1's regulatory and adjudicatory pathway to determine contravention of GST provisions after hearing the Petitioner.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 22-01-2025 concerning allegations of facilitating evasion of GST by partner hotels, concluding that the matter requires further adjudication after affording procedural fairness. The court found that Respondent No.1 must grant the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing based on all supplementary documents the Petitioner furnished, and remitted the matter for reconsideration consistent with principles of natural justice and statutory scheme under GST law. In consequence, the writ petition is disposed of without adjudication on merits, leaving open Respondent No.1's regulatory and adjudicatory pathway to determine contravention of GST provisions after hearing the Petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
