Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
The HC dismissed the petition seeking expedited disposal of a refund application, holding that the petitioner possessed an alternative statutory remedy before the appellate authority under s.107 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. The Court found no jurisdictional error in the authority's decision to process and dispose of the refund application and declined to entertain collateral challenge by way of the present application. Although acknowledging its power in exceptional cases to set aside interlocutory orders during writ proceedings, the HC concluded this was not such a case and refused interference with the impugned disposal. Petition accordingly disposed of.
The HC dismissed the petition seeking expedited disposal of a refund application, holding that the petitioner possessed an alternative statutory remedy before the appellate authority under s.107 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. The Court found no jurisdictional error in the authority's decision to process and dispose of the refund application and declined to entertain collateral challenge by way of the present application. Although acknowledging its power in exceptional cases to set aside interlocutory orders during writ proceedings, the HC concluded this was not such a case and refused interference with the impugned disposal. Petition accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
