Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the foreign taxpayer (a UK tax resident) and held that amounts received for provision of proprietary e-invoicing software and incidental training do not constitute "fees for technical services" under Article 13(4) of the India-UK DTAA. Relying on the HC's analysis, the tribunal found the requisite "make available" condition absent because the training merely enabled use of the taxpayer's e-platform and did not transfer technical know-how, processes, or rights that would allow the recipient to independently render the invoicing service. Consequently, such receipts do not accrue or arise in India as FTS and are not chargeable to tax under the Act.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the foreign taxpayer (a UK tax resident) and held that amounts received for provision of proprietary e-invoicing software and incidental training do not constitute "fees for technical services" under Article 13(4) of the India-UK DTAA. Relying on the HC's analysis, the tribunal found the requisite "make available" condition absent because the training merely enabled use of the taxpayer's e-platform and did not transfer technical know-how, processes, or rights that would allow the recipient to independently render the invoicing service. Consequently, such receipts do not accrue or arise in India as FTS and are not chargeable to tax under the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
