Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC affirms that an appeal under s.249(4)(a) to the CIT(A) is statutorily conditional upon payment/deposit of admitted tax; the statutory requirement admits no judicially implied exception or waiver. In proceedings under the block assessment provision s.158BC, the Court holds the CIT(A) lacks jurisdiction to entertain appeals where the pre-condition of payment of admitted tax remains unsatisfied, even if the legality of the admitted return is contested. The Tribunal's conclusion that the appellant's CIT(A) appeal was not maintainable for non-payment of admitted tax is sustained. The appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of law are answered against the appellant.
The HC affirms that an appeal under s.249(4)(a) to the CIT(A) is statutorily conditional upon payment/deposit of admitted tax; the statutory requirement admits no judicially implied exception or waiver. In proceedings under the block assessment provision s.158BC, the Court holds the CIT(A) lacks jurisdiction to entertain appeals where the pre-condition of payment of admitted tax remains unsatisfied, even if the legality of the admitted return is contested. The Tribunal's conclusion that the appellant's CIT(A) appeal was not maintainable for non-payment of admitted tax is sustained. The appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of law are answered against the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.