Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
CESTAT dismissed the second rectification application as not maintainable and sustained the revenue's objection. The Tribunal held that where a rectification petition filed by one party has been considered and decided by the Tribunal under s.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, a subsequent rectification by either party on the same issue (here, eligibility for SSI threshold exemption) cannot be entertained; a second rectification is permissible only in respect of matters not earlier adjudicated in any rectification application by either party. Consequently, the second rectification was rejected and the application was dismissed.
CESTAT dismissed the second rectification application as not maintainable and sustained the revenue's objection. The Tribunal held that where a rectification petition filed by one party has been considered and decided by the Tribunal under s.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, a subsequent rectification by either party on the same issue (here, eligibility for SSI threshold exemption) cannot be entertained; a second rectification is permissible only in respect of matters not earlier adjudicated in any rectification application by either party. Consequently, the second rectification was rejected and the application was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.