Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC allowed the petition and directed respondents to refund within two months the full penalty paid by the petitioner, with interest at 9% p.a. from payment date until refund, holding the detention and levy under Sec.129 CGST Act invalid insofar as no adjudicatory order was passed by the competent officer pursuant to Sec.129(3) of the Tripura SGST Act. The court found procedural failure-no reasons or Form MOV-09 order issued despite representations and requests for hearing-rendered the purported levy and collection without legal authority and violative of Art.14, Art.19(1)(g), Art.265 and Art.300-A. Petition allowed.
The HC allowed the petition and directed respondents to refund within two months the full penalty paid by the petitioner, with interest at 9% p.a. from payment date until refund, holding the detention and levy under Sec.129 CGST Act invalid insofar as no adjudicatory order was passed by the competent officer pursuant to Sec.129(3) of the Tripura SGST Act. The court found procedural failure-no reasons or Form MOV-09 order issued despite representations and requests for hearing-rendered the purported levy and collection without legal authority and violative of Art.14, Art.19(1)(g), Art.265 and Art.300-A. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
