Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC affirms AT and revenue findings, holding that receipt of Rs. 66,00,000 from the company constitutes salary, not professional/business income, because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence specifying nature or nexus of professional/technical services rendered. The court found a conflict of interest where loans advanced to the company were in the assessee's name, undermining the professional-fee characterization; TDS treatment as "professional charges" is not determinative of income heads. Further, interest expenditure of Rs. 45,26,956 is disallowed for lack of nexus with any business or profession of the assessee; mortgaging and advancing personal property to the company does not render the interest an allowable business expense. Appeal dismissed; decision for Revenue.
HC affirms AT and revenue findings, holding that receipt of Rs. 66,00,000 from the company constitutes salary, not professional/business income, because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence specifying nature or nexus of professional/technical services rendered. The court found a conflict of interest where loans advanced to the company were in the assessee's name, undermining the professional-fee characterization; TDS treatment as "professional charges" is not determinative of income heads. Further, interest expenditure of Rs. 45,26,956 is disallowed for lack of nexus with any business or profession of the assessee; mortgaging and advancing personal property to the company does not render the interest an allowable business expense. Appeal dismissed; decision for Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
