Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
ITAT held that the TPO's ad-hoc 50% adjustment to RHQ charges lacked a suitable comparable and did not comply with Rule 10AB or section 92C, rendering the benchmarking unsustainable; the TPO failed to apply any prescribed method or to bring a comparable uncontrolled price on record when invoking the "Other Method," and therefore the ALP determination was void. On the facts and law the Tribunal accepted the Taxpayer's aggregation/TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method and directed deletion of the entire transfer-pricing adjustment relating to allocation of RHQ charges, noting the AO/TPO's non-compliance with statutory provisions and absence of rebuttal material from the Revenue.
ITAT held that the TPO's ad-hoc 50% adjustment to RHQ charges lacked a suitable comparable and did not comply with Rule 10AB or section 92C, rendering the benchmarking unsustainable; the TPO failed to apply any prescribed method or to bring a comparable uncontrolled price on record when invoking the "Other Method," and therefore the ALP determination was void. On the facts and law the Tribunal accepted the Taxpayer's aggregation/TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method and directed deletion of the entire transfer-pricing adjustment relating to allocation of RHQ charges, noting the AO/TPO's non-compliance with statutory provisions and absence of rebuttal material from the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
