Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The HC set aside the impugned adjudication orders issued under s. 168A, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh proceedings, holding that the Petitioner was deprived of a proper opportunity to be heard and had not filed replies to the show cause notices; consequently the HC directed that the Petitioner be afforded the opportunity to file replies and to be heard on the merits. The HC granted the Petitioner specific time until 30 November 2025 to file replies to the impugned SCNs. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the foregoing directions, with liberty to the adjudicating authority to proceed thereafter in accordance with law.
The HC set aside the impugned adjudication orders issued under s. 168A, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh proceedings, holding that the Petitioner was deprived of a proper opportunity to be heard and had not filed replies to the show cause notices; consequently the HC directed that the Petitioner be afforded the opportunity to file replies and to be heard on the merits. The HC granted the Petitioner specific time until 30 November 2025 to file replies to the impugned SCNs. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the foregoing directions, with liberty to the adjudicating authority to proceed thereafter in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
