Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT set aside additions under s.69A treating unsecured loans as unexplained money and allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found that the assessee furnished creditor details, ITR acknowledgements, accounts, bank statements and confirmations, and complied with s.133(6) and s.131 summonses, thereby discharging the initial onus; the burden accordingly shifted to the revenue, which failed to controvert or impugn the documents or point to any material defect. The AO's treatment of raised unsecured loans as unexplained cash was held contrary to the statutory scope of s.69A and the CIT(A)'s confirmation of that view was reversed.
ITAT set aside additions under s.69A treating unsecured loans as unexplained money and allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found that the assessee furnished creditor details, ITR acknowledgements, accounts, bank statements and confirmations, and complied with s.133(6) and s.131 summonses, thereby discharging the initial onus; the burden accordingly shifted to the revenue, which failed to controvert or impugn the documents or point to any material defect. The AO's treatment of raised unsecured loans as unexplained cash was held contrary to the statutory scope of s.69A and the CIT(A)'s confirmation of that view was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
