Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC disposed the petition and directed the Respondent to expeditiously adjudicate the Petitioner's IGST refund applications. The court held that refunds must be processed strictly in accordance with the statutory scheme and timelines; where the Department failed to issue a deficiency memo within the prescribed period, the Petitioner is entitled to interest for the resultant delay. Simultaneously, the court noted the Petitioner's own inordinate delay in responding to the deficiency memo and required the Respondent to account for that delay when quantifying interest. The HC ordered prompt final decision on the refund claims consistent with the Act and Rules.
The HC disposed the petition and directed the Respondent to expeditiously adjudicate the Petitioner's IGST refund applications. The court held that refunds must be processed strictly in accordance with the statutory scheme and timelines; where the Department failed to issue a deficiency memo within the prescribed period, the Petitioner is entitled to interest for the resultant delay. Simultaneously, the court noted the Petitioner's own inordinate delay in responding to the deficiency memo and required the Respondent to account for that delay when quantifying interest. The HC ordered prompt final decision on the refund claims consistent with the Act and Rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
