Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the validity of the impugned show-cause notice issued to the transferor company, holding that the notice is not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction; factual and jurisdictional questions relating to the demerger and retrospective operation of the 2018 Notification require examination and cannot be summarily struck down. The Respondents are entitled to consider the demerger particulars and the applicability of the 2018 Notification when adjudicating the SCN, and the Petitioners are relegated to file a detailed response with full particulars and exhaust statutory remedies. The court found no exceptional circumstance to preclude adjudication or to quash the SCN at the threshold.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the validity of the impugned show-cause notice issued to the transferor company, holding that the notice is not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction; factual and jurisdictional questions relating to the demerger and retrospective operation of the 2018 Notification require examination and cannot be summarily struck down. The Respondents are entitled to consider the demerger particulars and the applicability of the 2018 Notification when adjudicating the SCN, and the Petitioners are relegated to file a detailed response with full particulars and exhaust statutory remedies. The court found no exceptional circumstance to preclude adjudication or to quash the SCN at the threshold.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
