Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and restoring the Deputy Commissioner's directions permitting the appellant to seek amendment of Bills of Entry under s.149 of the Customs Act to claim the concessional Additional Duty under the notification dated 17.03.2012, subject to satisfaction of Condition No.16. The Tribunal held that, in light of authoritative SC pronouncements on analogous conditional exemptions and on the operation of s.27, the claim for refund or lower duty cannot be denied where statutory amendment of the self-assessment (by proceeding under s.149) is permissible; accordingly the appellant is entitled to pursue amendment of assessments as ordered.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and restoring the Deputy Commissioner's directions permitting the appellant to seek amendment of Bills of Entry under s.149 of the Customs Act to claim the concessional Additional Duty under the notification dated 17.03.2012, subject to satisfaction of Condition No.16. The Tribunal held that, in light of authoritative SC pronouncements on analogous conditional exemptions and on the operation of s.27, the claim for refund or lower duty cannot be denied where statutory amendment of the self-assessment (by proceeding under s.149) is permissible; accordingly the appellant is entitled to pursue amendment of assessments as ordered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
