Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petitioner's regular bail application, observing that alleged offences of fraudulent availment/utilization of Input Tax Credit involve statutory punishments attracting imprisonment up to five years but are compoundable; liability for exact tax evasion remains to be determined by assessment/adjudication. The court found no justification for continued detention where no custodial interrogation was claimed and principal evidence is documentary/electronic, reducing risk of witness tampering. The petitioner, who had been in custody, was ordered released on furnishing personal bonds with two solvent sureties in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court/Duty Magistrate and subject to such conditions as the releasing authority may impose.
The HC allowed the petitioner's regular bail application, observing that alleged offences of fraudulent availment/utilization of Input Tax Credit involve statutory punishments attracting imprisonment up to five years but are compoundable; liability for exact tax evasion remains to be determined by assessment/adjudication. The court found no justification for continued detention where no custodial interrogation was claimed and principal evidence is documentary/electronic, reducing risk of witness tampering. The petitioner, who had been in custody, was ordered released on furnishing personal bonds with two solvent sureties in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court/Duty Magistrate and subject to such conditions as the releasing authority may impose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
