Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC allowed the petitioner's regular bail application, observing that alleged offences of fraudulent availment/utilization of Input Tax Credit involve statutory punishments attracting imprisonment up to five years but are compoundable; liability for exact tax evasion remains to be determined by assessment/adjudication. The court found no justification for continued detention where no custodial interrogation was claimed and principal evidence is documentary/electronic, reducing risk of witness tampering. The petitioner, who had been in custody, was ordered released on furnishing personal bonds with two solvent sureties in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court/Duty Magistrate and subject to such conditions as the releasing authority may impose.
The HC allowed the petitioner's regular bail application, observing that alleged offences of fraudulent availment/utilization of Input Tax Credit involve statutory punishments attracting imprisonment up to five years but are compoundable; liability for exact tax evasion remains to be determined by assessment/adjudication. The court found no justification for continued detention where no custodial interrogation was claimed and principal evidence is documentary/electronic, reducing risk of witness tampering. The petitioner, who had been in custody, was ordered released on furnishing personal bonds with two solvent sureties in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court/Duty Magistrate and subject to such conditions as the releasing authority may impose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
