Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
The HC allowed the petition, quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 25 February 2025, holding that statutory and other pre-approval claims not incorporated in an approved resolution plan stand extinguished on the date of approval under Section 31, IBC. The court found respondents' issuance and disposal of a show-cause notice post-approval to be contrary to binding apex court precedent and therefore wholly without jurisdiction. Consequently respondents are barred from pursuing proceedings or recovering dues accruing prior to the transfer/approval date, and the relief sought by the petitioner is granted, with all proceedings in respect of non-plan claims declared null and void.
The HC allowed the petition, quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 25 February 2025, holding that statutory and other pre-approval claims not incorporated in an approved resolution plan stand extinguished on the date of approval under Section 31, IBC. The court found respondents' issuance and disposal of a show-cause notice post-approval to be contrary to binding apex court precedent and therefore wholly without jurisdiction. Consequently respondents are barred from pursuing proceedings or recovering dues accruing prior to the transfer/approval date, and the relief sought by the petitioner is granted, with all proceedings in respect of non-plan claims declared null and void.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4893 
