Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC held that the powers under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules may be exercised only in respect of input tax credit reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger on the date of making and serving the impugned blocking order. Applying precedent, the court quashed and set aside the impugned order insofar as it exceeded that scope and directed the Respondents to restore to the Petitioner the blocked input tax credit equivalent to amounts recovered by the Respondents for June, July and August 2025 that are not otherwise set aside. The directive mandates restoration of ledger credit while preserving any recoveries that remain valid.
The HC held that the powers under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules may be exercised only in respect of input tax credit reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger on the date of making and serving the impugned blocking order. Applying precedent, the court quashed and set aside the impugned order insofar as it exceeded that scope and directed the Respondents to restore to the Petitioner the blocked input tax credit equivalent to amounts recovered by the Respondents for June, July and August 2025 that are not otherwise set aside. The directive mandates restoration of ledger credit while preserving any recoveries that remain valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
