Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
The HC held that DRP directions uploaded to the ITBA portal with a DIN on 26.05.2022 constitute receipt by the assessing officer for limitation purposes under section 144C(13). Uploading ipso facto effects service; physical speed-post receipt on 01.06.2022 was inconsequential. Consequently the one-month limitation period expired on 30.06.2022 and the assessment order passed on 01.07.2022 is time-barred and therefore invalid. The court rejected the Revenue's contention that international taxation matters fall outside electronic communication, noting DRP directions were uploaded by the Revenue and electronic service under the e-Assessment Scheme governs computation of limitation. No substantial question of law arises.
The HC held that DRP directions uploaded to the ITBA portal with a DIN on 26.05.2022 constitute receipt by the assessing officer for limitation purposes under section 144C(13). Uploading ipso facto effects service; physical speed-post receipt on 01.06.2022 was inconsequential. Consequently the one-month limitation period expired on 30.06.2022 and the assessment order passed on 01.07.2022 is time-barred and therefore invalid. The court rejected the Revenue's contention that international taxation matters fall outside electronic communication, noting DRP directions were uploaded by the Revenue and electronic service under the e-Assessment Scheme governs computation of limitation. No substantial question of law arises.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
