Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
HC dismissed the writ by permitting the Petitioner, who had already paid the penalty levied under s.74(9) of the respective GST enactments, to challenge the impugned order dated 26.01.2025 before the Appellate Authority under s.107 within thirty days from receipt of this judgment. The Appellate Authority is directed to admit and decide the appeal on merits after hearing the Petitioner, explicitly without raising the bar of limitation by virtue of prior payment. No estoppel arises from payment to preclude appellate adjudication. The writ is disposed of, subject to the foregoing liberty to pursue statutory appeal.
HC dismissed the writ by permitting the Petitioner, who had already paid the penalty levied under s.74(9) of the respective GST enactments, to challenge the impugned order dated 26.01.2025 before the Appellate Authority under s.107 within thirty days from receipt of this judgment. The Appellate Authority is directed to admit and decide the appeal on merits after hearing the Petitioner, explicitly without raising the bar of limitation by virtue of prior payment. No estoppel arises from payment to preclude appellate adjudication. The writ is disposed of, subject to the foregoing liberty to pursue statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
