Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC held that the impugned provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts was valid insofar as the exercising officer is concerned: Notification No. 14/2017 dated 1 July 2017 accords the rank of Principal Commissioner, GST to the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, thereby conferring competence under section 83, CGST Act, 2017 to issue provisional attachments. The Petitioner's challenge to the officer's authority was rejected as unsustainable. The HC nevertheless permitted the Petitioner to file fresh objections to the provisional attachment; upon such filing the authority must communicate its reasons for the attachment to the Petitioner within two weeks. Petition dismissed as disposed.
HC held that the impugned provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts was valid insofar as the exercising officer is concerned: Notification No. 14/2017 dated 1 July 2017 accords the rank of Principal Commissioner, GST to the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, thereby conferring competence under section 83, CGST Act, 2017 to issue provisional attachments. The Petitioner's challenge to the officer's authority was rejected as unsustainable. The HC nevertheless permitted the Petitioner to file fresh objections to the provisional attachment; upon such filing the authority must communicate its reasons for the attachment to the Petitioner within two weeks. Petition dismissed as disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
