Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC refused bail to the accused, holding that prima facie...
The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continue
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC refused bail to the accused, holding that prima facie evidence indicates misuse of the complainant's GST credentials to effect fraudulent transactions totalling Rs. 1,09,11,404 via multiple proprietorships, and that multiple persons appear implicated, necessitating further investigation. The court found the arrest and transit remand procedures to have been lawfully completed, rejecting contention of procedural illegality. The HC further held that because the offence is cognizable and preliminary enquiry would only serve limited purpose of ascertaining cognizability, the accused is not entitled to bail at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed and disposed of.
The HC refused bail to the accused, holding that prima facie evidence indicates misuse of the complainant's GST credentials to effect fraudulent transactions totalling Rs. 1,09,11,404 via multiple proprietorships, and that multiple persons appear implicated, necessitating further investigation. The court found the arrest and transit remand procedures to have been lawfully completed, rejecting contention of procedural illegality. The HC further held that because the offence is cognizable and preliminary enquiry would only serve limited purpose of ascertaining cognizability, the accused is not entitled to bail at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed and disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
