Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
The HC set aside the impugned order assessing GST on the supply of a corporate guarantee furnished by the petitioner to a related entity, finding the assessing officer failed to consider the petitioner's contention that no consideration was received and that applicable circulars applied. The court held non-consideration of a defense renders an administrative order vulnerable. The matter is remitted to the respondent for fresh adjudication; the respondent is directed to consider all contentions raised by the petitioner in its reply and to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. The petition is allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside the impugned order assessing GST on the supply of a corporate guarantee furnished by the petitioner to a related entity, finding the assessing officer failed to consider the petitioner's contention that no consideration was received and that applicable circulars applied. The court held non-consideration of a defense renders an administrative order vulnerable. The matter is remitted to the respondent for fresh adjudication; the respondent is directed to consider all contentions raised by the petitioner in its reply and to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. The petition is allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.