Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC set aside the impugned order assessing GST on the supply of a corporate guarantee furnished by the petitioner to a related entity, finding the assessing officer failed to consider the petitioner's contention that no consideration was received and that applicable circulars applied. The court held non-consideration of a defense renders an administrative order vulnerable. The matter is remitted to the respondent for fresh adjudication; the respondent is directed to consider all contentions raised by the petitioner in its reply and to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. The petition is allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside the impugned order assessing GST on the supply of a corporate guarantee furnished by the petitioner to a related entity, finding the assessing officer failed to consider the petitioner's contention that no consideration was received and that applicable circulars applied. The court held non-consideration of a defense renders an administrative order vulnerable. The matter is remitted to the respondent for fresh adjudication; the respondent is directed to consider all contentions raised by the petitioner in its reply and to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. The petition is allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.