Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC quashed the impugned order passed u/s 73 of the TNGST and CGST Acts, 2017, holding that the assessment/order violated principles of natural justice. The Petitioner had received only notices in Form GST ASMT-10 and DRC-01A dated 16.10.2024 and filed substantive responses on 10.12.2024 and 21.01.2025; copies of the DRC-01 dated 16.11.2024 were not uploaded, depriving the Petitioner of an opportunity to reply to material allegations. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Respondent to decide afresh on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously. Petition disposed of.
HC quashed the impugned order passed u/s 73 of the TNGST and CGST Acts, 2017, holding that the assessment/order violated principles of natural justice. The Petitioner had received only notices in Form GST ASMT-10 and DRC-01A dated 16.10.2024 and filed substantive responses on 10.12.2024 and 21.01.2025; copies of the DRC-01 dated 16.11.2024 were not uploaded, depriving the Petitioner of an opportunity to reply to material allegations. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Respondent to decide afresh on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
