Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC upheld the rejection of the s.161 application and dismissed the challenge to the orders under s.73 of the respective GST enactments insofar as the impugned order dated 25.02.2025 is found to be a detailed adjudicatory determination not warranting exercise of s.161 remedial jurisdiction. The court held that the s.161 rejection is sustainable. The Respondent is directed to pass a fresh order thereafter, conditioned upon the Petitioner's compliance with the stipulated requirements imposed by the Respondent. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, with no further interference in the impugned assessment order absent such compliance.
HC upheld the rejection of the s.161 application and dismissed the challenge to the orders under s.73 of the respective GST enactments insofar as the impugned order dated 25.02.2025 is found to be a detailed adjudicatory determination not warranting exercise of s.161 remedial jurisdiction. The court held that the s.161 rejection is sustainable. The Respondent is directed to pass a fresh order thereafter, conditioned upon the Petitioner's compliance with the stipulated requirements imposed by the Respondent. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, with no further interference in the impugned assessment order absent such compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
