Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the revisionary orders passed by PCIT under s.263 were ultravires and unsustainable. The Tribunal found that the AO, in assessments framed under s.153A, did not make additions based on any incriminating material seized in the search, nor did the PCIT's s.263 order record reliance on such material. The PCIT's examination of the assessee's entitlement to deduction under s.80IC went beyond the scope of the s.153A assessment and thus outside the jurisdictional ambit of s.263. Consequently, the s.263 order was quashed as erroneous for lack of statutory mandate; the Tribunal did not adjudicate on the substantive merits of the s.80IC claim.
ITAT held that the revisionary orders passed by PCIT under s.263 were ultravires and unsustainable. The Tribunal found that the AO, in assessments framed under s.153A, did not make additions based on any incriminating material seized in the search, nor did the PCIT's s.263 order record reliance on such material. The PCIT's examination of the assessee's entitlement to deduction under s.80IC went beyond the scope of the s.153A assessment and thus outside the jurisdictional ambit of s.263. Consequently, the s.263 order was quashed as erroneous for lack of statutory mandate; the Tribunal did not adjudicate on the substantive merits of the s.80IC claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.