Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC dismissed the petition and rejected petitioners' application under Section 161 of the CGST Act for rectification of the show-cause notice, holding no error apparent on the face of the record. The court found that alleged numerical or valuation errors in the SCN can be contested by filing a response with supporting documentary evidence before the adjudicating authority, and that invoking Section 161 to amend the SCN constituted an impermissible dilatory stratagem. Contentious questions of valuation, inclusion of free supplies under Section 15(2)(b) and Circular, and the applicability of Section 6(2)(b) raise factual disputes unsuitable for summary rectification and must be adjudicated in the proper proceedings; writ dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition and rejected petitioners' application under Section 161 of the CGST Act for rectification of the show-cause notice, holding no error apparent on the face of the record. The court found that alleged numerical or valuation errors in the SCN can be contested by filing a response with supporting documentary evidence before the adjudicating authority, and that invoking Section 161 to amend the SCN constituted an impermissible dilatory stratagem. Contentious questions of valuation, inclusion of free supplies under Section 15(2)(b) and Circular, and the applicability of Section 6(2)(b) raise factual disputes unsuitable for summary rectification and must be adjudicated in the proper proceedings; writ dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
