Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The HC dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus to compel inclusion of petrol and diesel within the GST regime, holding that fixation of an effective date is a policy decision vested in the GST Council and not a justiciable right of citizens. The court ruled it lacked jurisdiction to direct the Council to set a date, as no statutory or constitutional right entitles petitioners to command that policy outcome under Article 279A. Reliance on authorities concerning statutory professional rights was distinguished. Because the subject matter is squarely within the GST Council's policy domain, judicial interference by way of mandamus was declined and the petitions were dismissed.
The HC dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus to compel inclusion of petrol and diesel within the GST regime, holding that fixation of an effective date is a policy decision vested in the GST Council and not a justiciable right of citizens. The court ruled it lacked jurisdiction to direct the Council to set a date, as no statutory or constitutional right entitles petitioners to command that policy outcome under Article 279A. Reliance on authorities concerning statutory professional rights was distinguished. Because the subject matter is squarely within the GST Council's policy domain, judicial interference by way of mandamus was declined and the petitions were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
