Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening of assessment...
Petition challenging reassessment under s.147 dismissed where no jurisdictional plea; courts defer to administrative belief unless arbitrary or mala fide
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening of assessment under s.147, upholding the impugned order where no jurisdictional plea was advanced. The court held that review of the sufficiency or adequacy of the recorded reasons to believe is circumscribed by judicial restraint and the Wednesbury principle of reasonableness; courts do not act as appellate bodies to reassess administrative satisfaction absent arbitrariness or mala fides. The formation of opinion by tax authorities is administrative, requiring honest, bona fide information and a reasonable nexus to alleged non-production of documents; extraneous material vitiates the belief. In consequence, the petition was dismissed and the reassessment proceedings remain valid.
HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening of assessment under s.147, upholding the impugned order where no jurisdictional plea was advanced. The court held that review of the sufficiency or adequacy of the recorded reasons to believe is circumscribed by judicial restraint and the Wednesbury principle of reasonableness; courts do not act as appellate bodies to reassess administrative satisfaction absent arbitrariness or mala fides. The formation of opinion by tax authorities is administrative, requiring honest, bona fide information and a reasonable nexus to alleged non-production of documents; extraneous material vitiates the belief. In consequence, the petition was dismissed and the reassessment proceedings remain valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.