Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The ITAT upheld the PCIT's exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under s.263, holding that s.263 is available to correct an order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue even where the error is apparent from the record and potentially rectifiable under s.154 or s.147. The AO's order was found erroneous and prejudicial for disallowing depreciation on goodwill to the extent of Rs.10,89,82,058 as against the claim of Rs.27,63,20,888, and the PCIT's directions under s.263 were sustained. Merits of the depreciation claim (including reliance on judicial precedents) were left to the pending appeal against quantum before the ld. CIT(A). The assessee's appeal is dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the PCIT's exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under s.263, holding that s.263 is available to correct an order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue even where the error is apparent from the record and potentially rectifiable under s.154 or s.147. The AO's order was found erroneous and prejudicial for disallowing depreciation on goodwill to the extent of Rs.10,89,82,058 as against the claim of Rs.27,63,20,888, and the PCIT's directions under s.263 were sustained. Merits of the depreciation claim (including reliance on judicial precedents) were left to the pending appeal against quantum before the ld. CIT(A). The assessee's appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
