Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition without quashing the impugned...
Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on merits
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC dismissed the petition without quashing the impugned notices, granting the petitioner liberty to furnish full details, including copies of state authority orders for 2017-18 and 2018-19 and particulars of pending appeals, for fresh consideration by the Central authorities; those authorities are directed to consider such submissions on their merits and in accordance with law. With respect to the remaining years (2019-20 to 2022-23), the HC held the asserted jurisdictional bar inapplicable and confirmed that the Central authorities are at liberty to adjudicate the notices for those years on merits. The petition is disposed of, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the directed disclosures.
The HC dismissed the petition without quashing the impugned notices, granting the petitioner liberty to furnish full details, including copies of state authority orders for 2017-18 and 2018-19 and particulars of pending appeals, for fresh consideration by the Central authorities; those authorities are directed to consider such submissions on their merits and in accordance with law. With respect to the remaining years (2019-20 to 2022-23), the HC held the asserted jurisdictional bar inapplicable and confirmed that the Central authorities are at liberty to adjudicate the notices for those years on merits. The petition is disposed of, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the directed disclosures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
