Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Page of 4920
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 98394 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s orders: the amount characterized as an "arbitration award" was held to be a typographical misclassification of software sale and the related addition was deleted; foreign exchange fluctuation gains were held to be business receipts directly relatable to export of software and therefore eligible for exemption under s.10A; and no disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was warranted where the assessee had deducted tax at source (albeit at a lower rate) on the buy-back consideration, such deduction being treated as compliance with the TDS obligation. The Revenue's challenge was therefore rejected in entirety.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s orders: the amount characterized as an "arbitration award" was held to be a typographical misclassification of software sale and the related addition was deleted; foreign exchange fluctuation gains were held to be business receipts directly relatable to export of software and therefore eligible for exemption under s.10A; and no disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was warranted where the assessee had deducted tax at source (albeit at a lower rate) on the buy-back consideration, such deduction being treated as compliance with the TDS obligation. The Revenue's challenge was therefore rejected in entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4920 
