Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
The HC held that the question whether the recipients of the petitioner's manpower services fall within the exemptions under the impugned notifications must be determined on facts and by reference to the status of each recipient, and is for the Appellate Authority to decide. Noting that the petitioner has not collected GST from its clients and given the factual nature of the dispute, the HC permitted the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act by 10 July 2025. The Appellate Authority is directed to consider the factual issues and to determine the quantum of any pre-deposit payable. Petition disposed.
The HC held that the question whether the recipients of the petitioner's manpower services fall within the exemptions under the impugned notifications must be determined on facts and by reference to the status of each recipient, and is for the Appellate Authority to decide. Noting that the petitioner has not collected GST from its clients and given the factual nature of the dispute, the HC permitted the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act by 10 July 2025. The Appellate Authority is directed to consider the factual issues and to determine the quantum of any pre-deposit payable. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
