Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
AAAR affirmed that the appellant is not entitled to avoid reversal of input tax credit (ITC) on common inputs and input services relating to mutual fund subscription and redemption, holding that the deeming provision in section 17(3) incorporates "transactions in securities" into the value of exempt supplies for ITC reversal. The authority rejected the contention that "securities" exclusion from goods/services removes them from exempt/non-taxable supply treatment and construed the Rule reference to "sale value" consistently with "transactions in securities," encompassing redemptions. The AAAR also found no substantiation that subscription/redemption activities were in the course or furtherance of the appellant's business. The appeal is dismissed.
AAAR affirmed that the appellant is not entitled to avoid reversal of input tax credit (ITC) on common inputs and input services relating to mutual fund subscription and redemption, holding that the deeming provision in section 17(3) incorporates "transactions in securities" into the value of exempt supplies for ITC reversal. The authority rejected the contention that "securities" exclusion from goods/services removes them from exempt/non-taxable supply treatment and construed the Rule reference to "sale value" consistently with "transactions in securities," encompassing redemptions. The AAAR also found no substantiation that subscription/redemption activities were in the course or furtherance of the appellant's business. The appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
