Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAAR affirmed the appellate authority's determination and dismissed the departmental appeal, holding that input tax credit (ITC) on capital goods comprising wires, cables and electrical equipment used to connect the DISCOM power supply to the respondent's factory is admissible. The Authority found no legally tenable ground in the Revenue's challenge that such items are excluded as 'plant and machinery' under section 17(5) or that section 18(6) procedures were infringed; the Revenue's contention of subsequent transfer to the transmission utility was unsubstantiated. In light of Board clarifications treating analogous infrastructure items as eligible, the GAAR findings were upheld and the appeal by the Assistant Commissioner was rejected.
AAAR affirmed the appellate authority's determination and dismissed the departmental appeal, holding that input tax credit (ITC) on capital goods comprising wires, cables and electrical equipment used to connect the DISCOM power supply to the respondent's factory is admissible. The Authority found no legally tenable ground in the Revenue's challenge that such items are excluded as 'plant and machinery' under section 17(5) or that section 18(6) procedures were infringed; the Revenue's contention of subsequent transfer to the transmission utility was unsubstantiated. In light of Board clarifications treating analogous infrastructure items as eligible, the GAAR findings were upheld and the appeal by the Assistant Commissioner was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.