Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT allowed the appeal by the Appellant and quashed and set aside the impugned order directing recovery of service tax, interest and penalty. The Tribunal held the impugned services to be IT-enabled services (SEO/web development) and not OIDAR, finding the provider did not own the data distributed over the internet. The payments to foreign clients were established as consideration for export of services on the basis of invoices and bank realizations, negating taxable liability under the impugned assessment. Consequently, the tax demand and ancillary charges were annulled and the appeal of the Appellant was allowed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal by the Appellant and quashed and set aside the impugned order directing recovery of service tax, interest and penalty. The Tribunal held the impugned services to be IT-enabled services (SEO/web development) and not OIDAR, finding the provider did not own the data distributed over the internet. The payments to foreign clients were established as consideration for export of services on the basis of invoices and bank realizations, negating taxable liability under the impugned assessment. Consequently, the tax demand and ancillary charges were annulled and the appeal of the Appellant was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.