Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80JJAA, holding that the delayed filing of revised Form 10DA during assessment proceedings constituted a procedural lapse and could not alone defeat substantive entitlement. Citing precedent of the HC and coordinate benches, the Tribunal observed that initial non-filing before the return due date is a procedural omission; therefore the Assessing Officer should not deny the deduction solely on that ground. As the lower authorities did not examine the correctness of the claim, the ITAT remitted the matter to the AO for limited verification and quantification of the allowable deduction, directing compliance with applicable procedural safeguards.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80JJAA, holding that the delayed filing of revised Form 10DA during assessment proceedings constituted a procedural lapse and could not alone defeat substantive entitlement. Citing precedent of the HC and coordinate benches, the Tribunal observed that initial non-filing before the return due date is a procedural omission; therefore the Assessing Officer should not deny the deduction solely on that ground. As the lower authorities did not examine the correctness of the claim, the ITAT remitted the matter to the AO for limited verification and quantification of the allowable deduction, directing compliance with applicable procedural safeguards.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.