Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's directive requiring the appellant to lift the lien and release a fixed deposit of Rs.27.60 crores (with interest) held in the name of the corporate debtor. The Tribunal held the appellant's refusal to release the FD on account of alleged dues of a related group company was unjustified: the lien letter authorised retention only for amounts due from the corporate debtor itself, singly or jointly, and no facility existed against which the corporate debtor was liable. Consequently, the Adjudicating Authority's order was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's directive requiring the appellant to lift the lien and release a fixed deposit of Rs.27.60 crores (with interest) held in the name of the corporate debtor. The Tribunal held the appellant's refusal to release the FD on account of alleged dues of a related group company was unjustified: the lien letter authorised retention only for amounts due from the corporate debtor itself, singly or jointly, and no facility existed against which the corporate debtor was liable. Consequently, the Adjudicating Authority's order was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
