Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
