Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The ITAT upheld that a unilateral APA, covering AYs 2016-17 to 2020-21 and rolled back to AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16, applies to AY 2013-14 for the issue of reimbursement of AMP expenses; accordingly, appeals of the assessee and revenue on that issue were dismissed. On alleged TDS defaults under s.195 and consequent disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for payments to non-residents, the ITAT found material facts regarding the nature of services, cost-plus markup and the "make available" contention were not on record; the claims warranted re-verification. The ITAT set aside the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders and remitted the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
The ITAT upheld that a unilateral APA, covering AYs 2016-17 to 2020-21 and rolled back to AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16, applies to AY 2013-14 for the issue of reimbursement of AMP expenses; accordingly, appeals of the assessee and revenue on that issue were dismissed. On alleged TDS defaults under s.195 and consequent disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for payments to non-residents, the ITAT found material facts regarding the nature of services, cost-plus markup and the "make available" contention were not on record; the claims warranted re-verification. The ITAT set aside the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders and remitted the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
