Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The ITAT held that, pursuant to s.199(3) read with r.37BA, TDS credit must be granted to the person on whose payment the tax was deducted where the deduction is reflected in Form 26AS; consequently the appellant, being the agent who had payments reflected in Form 26AS, is entitled to credit of the full TDS so reflected. The tribunal further held that the r.37BA(2) declaration mechanism is directory not mandatory, and commercial exigencies justified non-issuance of declarations to the foreign principal. In absence of any Revenue contention on understatement of income or audit qualification, the balance TDS credit claimed by the appellant was allowed.
The ITAT held that, pursuant to s.199(3) read with r.37BA, TDS credit must be granted to the person on whose payment the tax was deducted where the deduction is reflected in Form 26AS; consequently the appellant, being the agent who had payments reflected in Form 26AS, is entitled to credit of the full TDS so reflected. The tribunal further held that the r.37BA(2) declaration mechanism is directory not mandatory, and commercial exigencies justified non-issuance of declarations to the foreign principal. In absence of any Revenue contention on understatement of income or audit qualification, the balance TDS credit claimed by the appellant was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
