Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT remanded the transfer-pricing issues to the file of the AO/TPO for fresh benchmarking of international transactions, holding that key contentions raised by the assessee regarding pricing and comparability were raised for the first time on appeal and require reconsideration; grounds 2-8 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to permit interest disallowance under the proviso to s.36(1) to be treated as revenue expenditure in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal also held that contested advertisement expenditure is revenue in nature and allowed the corresponding ground of appeal.
ITAT remanded the transfer-pricing issues to the file of the AO/TPO for fresh benchmarking of international transactions, holding that key contentions raised by the assessee regarding pricing and comparability were raised for the first time on appeal and require reconsideration; grounds 2-8 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to permit interest disallowance under the proviso to s.36(1) to be treated as revenue expenditure in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal also held that contested advertisement expenditure is revenue in nature and allowed the corresponding ground of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
