Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
AAAR dismissed the appeal as time-barred. The Appellant filed the appeal 105 days after the last permissible date under Section 100(2) CGST Act (including the maximum 30-day condonable period in the proviso), exceeding AAAR's jurisdiction to condone delay. AAAR found the reasons for delay insufficient and held it lacked authority to extend the statutory limitation further; consequently the appeal was not admitted and the merits regarding eligibility to claim input tax credit for design, engineering, installation and operation of the 10.2 MW solar plant were not adjudicated. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution ratione temporis without consideration of substantive issues.
AAAR dismissed the appeal as time-barred. The Appellant filed the appeal 105 days after the last permissible date under Section 100(2) CGST Act (including the maximum 30-day condonable period in the proviso), exceeding AAAR's jurisdiction to condone delay. AAAR found the reasons for delay insufficient and held it lacked authority to extend the statutory limitation further; consequently the appeal was not admitted and the merits regarding eligibility to claim input tax credit for design, engineering, installation and operation of the 10.2 MW solar plant were not adjudicated. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution ratione temporis without consideration of substantive issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
