Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC permitted the Petitioner to refrain from pressing its challenge to the impugned notification and authorised the Petitioner to institute an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 November 2025 to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be entertained and adjudicated on merits and shall not be regarded as barred by limitation; the Appellate Authority is directed to pass a reasoned order. The Petitioner may advance all grounds and rely on any documents in the appeal. The petition is disposed of.
The HC permitted the Petitioner to refrain from pressing its challenge to the impugned notification and authorised the Petitioner to institute an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 November 2025 to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be entertained and adjudicated on merits and shall not be regarded as barred by limitation; the Appellate Authority is directed to pass a reasoned order. The Petitioner may advance all grounds and rely on any documents in the appeal. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
