Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
The HC permitted the Petitioner to refrain from pressing its challenge to the impugned notification and authorised the Petitioner to institute an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 November 2025 to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be entertained and adjudicated on merits and shall not be regarded as barred by limitation; the Appellate Authority is directed to pass a reasoned order. The Petitioner may advance all grounds and rely on any documents in the appeal. The petition is disposed of.
The HC permitted the Petitioner to refrain from pressing its challenge to the impugned notification and authorised the Petitioner to institute an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 November 2025 to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be entertained and adjudicated on merits and shall not be regarded as barred by limitation; the Appellate Authority is directed to pass a reasoned order. The Petitioner may advance all grounds and rely on any documents in the appeal. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
