Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging issuance of DRC-01, holding that the department did not accept the petitioner's initial reply and issued DRC-01; once the petitioner files a substantive reply to DRC-01 the department must pass a detailed, speaking order explaining reasons for any rejection. The court declined to adjudicate the underlying tax adjustment dispute at this interim stage and refused relief, but granted the petitioner liberty to file a reply to DRC-01 within two weeks of receipt of the order. On receipt, respondents must consider and decide the matter by a reasoned order within four weeks. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging issuance of DRC-01, holding that the department did not accept the petitioner's initial reply and issued DRC-01; once the petitioner files a substantive reply to DRC-01 the department must pass a detailed, speaking order explaining reasons for any rejection. The court declined to adjudicate the underlying tax adjustment dispute at this interim stage and refused relief, but granted the petitioner liberty to file a reply to DRC-01 within two weeks of receipt of the order. On receipt, respondents must consider and decide the matter by a reasoned order within four weeks. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.